Potential Lawsuit: Kentucky Employment Lawsuit

The document has moved here . Apache/2.2.17 (EL) Server at www.lawyersandsettlements.com Port 80
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/Kentucky-Labor-Law.html?ref=rss

Potential Lawsuit: Januvia Efectos Secundarios - Januvia Cáncer, Januvia Pancreatitis, Januvia Demand

The document has moved here . Apache/2.2.17 (EL) Server Personal Injury Lawyer at www.lawyersandsettlements.com Port 80
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/sp-januvia-side-effects.html?ref=rss

Potential Lawsuit: Clostridium Difficile Infection Linked to Antidepressant Use

The document has Personal Injury Lawyer moved here . Apache/2.2.17 (EL) Server at www.lawyersandsettlements.com Port 80
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/clostridium-difficile-infection-linked-to.html?ref=rss

Potential Lawsuit: Valproate Not To Be Used for Migraine During Pregnancy, FDA Warns

What are you looking for? Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Valproate Not To Be Used for Migraine During Pregnancy, FDA Warns Valproate Not To Be Used for Migraine During Pregnancy, FDA Warns Washington, DC: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is advising health care professionals and women that the anti-seizure medication valproate sodium (Depakote) and related products, valproic acid and divalproex sodium, are contraindicated and should not be taken by pregnant women for the prevention of migraine headaches. Based on information from a recent study, there is evidence that these medications can cause decreased IQ scores in children whose mothers took them while pregnant. Stronger warnings about use during pregnancy will be added to the drug labels, and valproate's pregnancy category for migraine use will be changed from "D" (the potential benefit of the drug in pregnant women may be acceptable despite its potential risks) to "X" (the risk of use in pregnant women clearly outweighs any possible benefit of the drug). Valproate products will remain in pregnancy category D for treating epilepsy and manic episodes associated with bipolar http://attorney-in-temecula.com/more-information/personal-injury/ disorder. Valproate products are approved for the treatment of certain types of epilepsy, the treatment of manic episodes associated with bipolar disorder, and the prevention of migraine headaches. They are also used off-label (for uses not approved by FDA) for other conditions, particularly other psychiatric conditions. This alert is based on the final results of the Neurodevelopmental Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs (NEAD) study showing that children exposed to valproate products while their mothers were pregnant had decreased IQs at age 6 compared to children exposed to other anti-epileptic drugs. For additional details, see the Drug Safety Communication Data Summary section. Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/valproate-not-to-be-used-migraine-during-pregnancy.html?ref=rss

Potential Lawsuit: Diabetes Medication Lawsuits

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Diabetes Medication Side Effects Lawsuits Diabetes Medication Lawsuits Were you looking for Actos or Byetta or Januvia or Victoza Side Effects lawsuits? The use of some diabetes medications has been linked in recent studies to an increased risk of diabetes medication side effects including a risk of thyroid cancer and/or pancreatic cancer. Lawsuits have been filed against the makers of some diabetes drugs, alleging patients were not adequately warned about the risks. FREE CASE EVALUATION Send your Diabetes Medication claim to a Lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation. Diabetes Medication Side Effects Sitaglptin (Januvia, Janumet, Janumet XR, Juvisync) Liraglutide (Victoza) Saxagliptin (Onglyza, Kombiglyze XR) Alogliptin (Nesina, Kazano, Oseni) Linagliptin (Tradjenta, Jentadueto) The drugs are in a class of diabetes medication called incretin mimetic drugs because they mimic incretin hormones that are naturally produced in the body, and which stimulate the release of insulin following a meal. On March 14, 2013, the FDA issued a Drug Safety Communication about the drugs noting that it was evaluating findings from researchers that suggested an increased risk of pancreatitis and pre-cancerous cellular changes in patients who used incretin mimetics. Pancreatitis is also associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. At the time, the FDA said it had not reached new conclusions about the drugs, and said it has not concluded the drugs cause or contribute to pancreatic cancer. Both exenatide and sitagliptin have also been linked in reports to fatal and nonfatal cases of acute pancreatitis. The FDA noted that one study found up to double the risk of acute pancreatitis in patients who used either of those drugs. Byetta Lawsuits Byetta has been linked to an increased risk of acute pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and thyroid cancer. The US Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) has issued warnings about Byetta, including reports of necrotizing or hemorrhagic pancreatitis, two of which resulted in death. Byetta lawsuits have been filed against the maker of the drug, alleging patients developed pancreatic cancer after using the diabetes medication. Januvia Lawsuits Januvia has been linked to an increased risk of acute pancreatitis. Between October 16, 2006, and February 9, 2009, the FDA reportedly received 88 post-marketing reports of acute pancreatitis linked to the medication. Of those, 66 were hospitalized and four were treated in the intensive care unit. One study, published in the journal Gastroenterology (7/11) suggested a link between the use of Januvia and the development of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, but other researchers argued the study was flawed. In March 2013, the FDA announced it was undertaking a safety review of Januvia, Byetta and Bydureon to determine the risk of pancreatitis in patients who used the medications. In addition, a motion has been filed with the US Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) to consolidate approximately 53 lawsuits that allege pancreatic cancer as a result of Januvia, Janumet, Byetta and Victoza. Victoza Lawsuits In March 2013, the FDA announced that results from a study suggested Victoza was linked to an increased risk of pancreatitis. The FDA has not so far requested any changes to the Victoza label, but it has said it is reviewing data from the study. Meanwhile, animal studies suggest Victoza is linked to an increased risk of a rare thyroid cancer called medullary thyroid cancer. Victoza is one of the diabetes drugs included in the motion filed with the US Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) that aims to consolidate diabetes drug lawsuits alleging pancreatic cancer as a result of taking Januvia, Janumet, Byetta or Victoza. Diabetes Medication Side Effects Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered Diabetes Medication damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be http://attorney-in-temecula.com/more-information/personal-injury/ sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/Diabetes-Medication-Side-Effects.html?ref=rss

Potential Lawsuit: Amiodarone Increases Risk for Cancer Study Finds

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Amiodarone Increases Risk for Cancer Study Finds Amiodarone Increases Risk for Cancer Study Finds Washington, DC: Men taking the antiarrhythmia drug amiodarone (Nexterone, Baxter Healthcare Corp), are at increased risk for cancer, according to a study published online in Cancer. The study also showed that men who had been exposed to the drug extensively, were at particularly high risk. The retrospective study found that the risk for cancer increased by nearly 20% in men taking amiodarone, compared with the general population, authors Chia-Jen Liu, MD, of National Yang-Ming University Hospital in Yilan, Taiwan and colleagues reported. Further, that risk increased to 46% among men whose cumulative defined daily doses in a year exceeded 180. The antiarrhythmia drug has been linked to numerous adverse health effects including thyroid dysfunction, pulmonary fibrosis, and skin and thyroid malignancies. The results from this latest study add to those of an earlier meta-analysis which also showed a potential association between amiodarone and cancer. Although amiodarone was approved in Europe and Canada and was commonly used in the 1980s, the FDA was reluctant to officially approve the use of amiodarone, since initial reports had shown increased incidence of serious pulmonary side effects of the drug. The FDA recognized that it was a dangerous drug and told doctors to be careful about its use. Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/cordarone-side-effects-amiodarone-cancer.html?ref=rss

Potential Lawsuit: California Wrongful Termination

California Wrongful Termination Were you looking for Employment Law - California or Wrongful Termination lawsuits?   California wrongful termination means that an employee in California has been fired or laid off for reasons that violate the employee's legal rights. If wrongful termination law has been violated in the firing or laying off of an employee, that employee may be able to file a wrongful termination lawsuit against his or her employer. FREE CASE EVALUATION Send your California Wrongful Termination claim to a Lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation. California Wrongful Termination and Employment At-Will California, like many other states, is an at-will state, meaning employers can discipline or fire employees at will (that is, without either needing or providing a reason to the employee). That said, there are situations in which the firing of an employee could be considered wrongful termination. This includes situations in which the employer is discriminating against the employee on the basis of age, race, sex, sexual orientation, disability, marital status, religion, http://cortrightlaw.com/personal-injury national origin or gender identity. For example a woman cannot be fired simply because she is a woman. Employees may also have an implied contract with their employer that could prevent the employer from firing the employee without just cause. These implied contracts may be informal and it is up to the court to determine if such a condition existed. The court bases this decision on a variety of factors including promises of job security, the employer's employee handbook or policies, and job performance evaluations. Finally, employees cannot be fired when the termination is based on a reason that is contrary to public policy. Firing an employee for refusing to do something illegal, for example, could be considered wrongful termination. Employers are also prohibited from firing, disciplining or retaliating against any employee who files a complaint with the government about illegal activities on the employer's part. California Employment Law California labor laws that protect employees are covered in the California Fair Employment And Housing Act. The Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) is the state organization charged with investigating allegations of discrimination on the job. In many cases, employees must file a complaint either with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing or with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC, the federal organization responsible for investigating employment complaints) before filing a lawsuit. There may also be local laws that prevent employers from firing or disciplining employees for a number of reasons. California Employee Law and Independent Contractors In California, job protections do not apply to independent contractors; however, it is not enough that an employer classify someone as an independent contractor. The determination of whether someone is an independent contractor is based on how the worker is treated. This includes examining whether the worker has control over his own work methods and is paid by the job. Any worker who is called an independent contractor but is treated as an employee is likely protected by California employment law. California Wrongful Termination Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered from Wrongful Termination in California, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a California Employment lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/california-wrongful-termination.html?ref=rss

Potential Lawsuit: Atlantic Power Corporation 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Atlantic Power Corporation Atlantic Power Corporation AT 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit Atlantic Power Corporation has been accused of securities fraud. If you are a current or former employee or are a member of any of Atlantic Power Corporation investment plans or profit sharing retirement plans you may be included in this possible Atlantic Power Corporation 401(k) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action. If you purchased or held Atlantic Power Corporation stock in one of those plans during the periods Jul-23-10 to Mar-4-13, you may have a claim. Under ERISA, Atlantic Power Corporation employees can file a lawsuit against the company for putting stock options at risk. Atlantic Power Corporation employees have a claim if they can prove their employer violated its fiduciary duty to its employees. Fiduciary duty http://attorney-in-rancho-cucamonga.com/more-information/personal-injury/ refers to a company's responsibility to the people who invest in it. If an employer puts the company's interest ahead of the investors', it has broken its fiduciary duty. A fiduciary is a person that exercises discretion over the management of plan assets or exercises discretionary control over the administration of the plan. ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for pension and health plans set up by private businesses. ERISA was designed to protect people who participate in employee benefit plans, including employees with stock options in a company. Stock options are a form of compensation in which employees are given the opportunity to purchase shares of the company stock at a certain price. Atlantic Power Corporation 401(k) / ERISA Legal Help If you have suffered from Atlantic Power Corporation 401(k) plan losses, you may qualify for damages or remedies that may be awarded in a possible Atlantic Power Corporation ERISA class action lawsuit. Please click the link below to submit your complaint and we will have a lawyer review your ERISA complaint.If you are NOT a current or former employee of this company, please use this form to register your complaint. Thank you.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/atlantic-power-corporation-at-securities-erisa.html?ref=rss

Potential Lawsuit: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, SPPI 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, has been accused of securities fraud. If you are a current or former employee or are a member of any of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, investment plans or profit sharing retirement plans you may be included in this possible Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, 401(k) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action. If you purchased or held Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, stock in one of those plans during the periods Aug-8-12 to Mar-12-13, you may have a claim. Under ERISA, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, employees can file a lawsuit against the company for putting stock options at risk. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, employees have a claim if they can prove their employer violated its fiduciary duty to its employees. Fiduciary duty refers to a company's responsibility to the people who invest in it. If an employer puts the company's interest ahead of the investors', it has broken its fiduciary duty. A fiduciary is a person that exercises discretion over http://attorney-in-palm-desert.com/more-information/personal-injury/ the management of plan assets or exercises discretionary control over the administration of the plan. ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for pension and health plans set up by private businesses. ERISA was designed to protect people who participate in employee benefit plans, including employees with stock options in a company. Stock options are a form of compensation in which employees are given the opportunity to purchase shares of the company stock at a certain price. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, 401(k) / ERISA Legal Help If you have suffered from Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, 401(k) plan losses, you may qualify for damages or remedies that may be awarded in a possible Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc, ERISA class action lawsuit. Please click the link below to submit your complaint and we will have a lawyer review your ERISA complaint.If you are NOT a current or former employee of this company, please use this form to register your complaint. Thank you.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/spectrum-pharmaceuticals-inc-sppi-securities-erisa.html?ref=rss

Potential Lawsuit: Valproate Not To Be Used for Migraine During Pregnancy, FDA Warns

What are you looking for? Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Valproate Not To Be Used for http://attorney-in-rancho-cucamonga.com/more-information/personal-injury/ Migraine During Pregnancy, FDA Warns Valproate Not To Be Used for Migraine During Pregnancy, FDA Warns Washington, DC: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is advising health care professionals and women that the anti-seizure medication valproate sodium (Depakote) and related products, valproic acid and divalproex sodium, are contraindicated and should not be taken by pregnant women for the prevention of migraine headaches. Based on information from a recent study, there is evidence that these medications can cause decreased IQ scores in children whose mothers took them while pregnant. Stronger warnings about use during pregnancy will be added to the drug labels, and valproate's pregnancy category for migraine use will be changed from "D" (the potential benefit of the drug in pregnant women may be acceptable despite its potential risks) to "X" (the risk of use in pregnant women clearly outweighs any possible benefit of the drug). Valproate products will remain in pregnancy category D for treating epilepsy and manic episodes associated with bipolar disorder. Valproate products are approved for the treatment of certain types of epilepsy, the treatment of manic episodes associated with bipolar disorder, and the prevention of migraine headaches. They are also used off-label (for uses not approved by FDA) for other conditions, particularly other psychiatric conditions. This alert is based on the final results of the Neurodevelopmental Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs (NEAD) study showing that children exposed to valproate products while their mothers were pregnant had decreased IQs at age 6 compared to children exposed to other anti-epileptic drugs. For additional details, see the Drug Safety Communication Data Summary section. Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/valproate-not-to-be-used-migraine-during-pregnancy.html?ref=rss

Potential Lawsuit: California Wrongful Termination

California Wrongful Termination Were you looking for Employment Law - California or Wrongful Termination lawsuits? California wrongful termination means that an employee in California has been fired or laid off for reasons that violate the employee's legal rights. If wrongful termination law has been violated in the firing or laying off of an employee, that employee may be able to file a wrongful termination lawsuit against his or her employer. FREE CASE EVALUATION Send your California Wrongful Termination claim to a Lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation. California Wrongful Termination and Employment At-Will California, like many other states, is an at-will state, meaning employers can discipline or fire employees at will (that is, without either needing or providing a reason to the employee). That said, there are situations in which the firing of an employee could be considered wrongful termination. This includes situations in which the employer is discriminating against the employee on the basis of age, race, sex, sexual orientation, disability, marital status, religion, national origin or gender identity. For example a woman cannot be fired simply because she is a woman. Employees may also have an implied contract with their employer that could prevent the employer from firing the employee without just cause. These implied contracts may be informal and it is up to the court to determine if such a condition existed. The court bases this decision on a variety of factors including promises of job security, the employer's employee handbook or policies, and job performance evaluations. Finally, employees cannot be fired when the termination is based on a reason that is contrary to public policy. Firing an employee for refusing to do something illegal, for example, could be considered wrongful termination. Employers are also prohibited from firing, disciplining or retaliating against any employee who files a complaint with the government about illegal activities on the employer's part. California Employment Law California labor laws that protect employees are covered in the California Fair Employment And Housing Act. The Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) is the state organization charged with investigating allegations of discrimination on the job. In many cases, employees must file a complaint either with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing or with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC, the federal organization responsible for investigating employment complaints) before filing a lawsuit. There may also be local laws that prevent employers from firing or disciplining employees for a number of reasons. California Employee Law and Independent Contractors In California, job protections do not apply to independent contractors; however, it is not enough that an employer classify someone as an independent contractor. The determination of whether someone is an independent contractor is based on how the worker is treated. This includes examining whether the worker has control over his own work methods and is paid by the job. Any worker who is called an independent contractor but is treated as an employee is likely protected by California employment law. California Wrongful Termination Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered from Wrongful Termination in California, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a California Employment lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/california-wrongful-termination.html?ref=rss

Thomas J. Henry Injury Attorneys Win $25 Million Verdict for Client in Workplace Injury Case

Henry Injury Attorneys client , Leo Davila . The case (Cause No. 10-60874-1) was tried in Nueces County Court at Law No.1 before Judge Robert Vargas . The case involved a work-related injury caused by an unsafe work environment. Mr. Davila sustained serious injuries, including a traumatic brain injury , requiring surgical intervention.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.sfgate.com/business/prweb/article/Thomas-J-Henry-Injury-Attorneys-Win-25-Million-4567006.php

Boca Raton Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyer Services Announced for All People Injured Over the Memorial Day Holiday Weekend

Boca Raton Car Accident and Personal Injury Lawyers, The Berman Law Group Florida Injury Lawyers, The Berman Law Group is now helping all people injured or hurt in an accident over the Memorial Day Weekend in Boca Raton Boca Raton, Florida (PRWEB) May 29, 2013 Boca Raton Personal injury lawyers, the Law Offices of Berman and Berman have just announced legal services for anyone who was in an accident or injured over the Memorial Day Weekend in Boca Raton, Florida. They know how fun the Memorial Day Holiday Weekend can be, but that fun can quickly turn to pain and suffering due to the recklessness of another party. If anyone is in need of personal injury or accident lawyers in Boca Raton, Florida , call the Berman Law Group at 1-877-529-8995 or on the local Boca Raton hotline at (561) 922-9089. They are offering legal consultations for all people injured over the weekend who are not sure what to do or what their legal options are. The Berman Law Offices specialize in accident and injury cases, whether they are car, truck, motorcycle, or boating accidents.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.prweb.com/releases/personal-injury-attorney/boca-raton-lawyer/prweb10770155.htm

Reno Personal Injury Attorney Robert Kilby Has Extensive Experience with Washoe County Law

The office of Robert Kilby Law is one of the first stops for Reno area residents who have suffered from a personal injury and are not sure what their rights and options are. Robert Kilby offers a free consultation service to any Reno or Washoe County resident who has suffered from a personal injury. Robert has significant experience in helping his clients get the compensation and peace of mind they need to be made whole after a devastating personal injury. Personal injury and liability law, commonly called tort law, is an extremely complex and murky legal area in Nevada. This is due to the many state businesses that legitimately require a bit of consumer protection.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/reno-personal-injury-attorney-robert-kilby-has-extensive-experience-with-washoe-county-law-257673.htm

Settlement: Drywaller Awarded $26.6M in Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit

What are you looking for? Home Page >> Settlements >> Drywaller Awarded $26.6M in Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Drywaller Awarded $26.6M in Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Please click here for a free evaluation of your claim San Pedro, CA: An asbestos mesothelioma verdict was reached in March in the case of Michael Sutherland, a former drywaller diagnosed with mesothelioma, a cancer caused by asbestos. The Los Angeles Superior Court jury that heard the case returned its verdict awarding $26.6 million to Michael and his wife Suszi. Mike testified that he worked as a drywaller in northern San Diego County from 1967, while he was still attending Madison High School, through 1993—with frequent breaks for extended surfing trips to Hawaii and Mexico. He worked at countless residential and commercial jobsites during the construction "boom" that occurred in north county in the 1970s, the same time that cancer-causing asbestos was used in many construction products including joint compound, fire-rated drywall, caulk, stucco, roofing mastic and asbestos cement pipe. "With all the trades working on top of each other trying to finish one job and move on to the next, it was always dusty," Mike recalled, "It wasn't until I became a lead maintenance mechanic at UC San Diego and attended a class on job safety in 2003 that I learned that so many of the materials used on the jobs back then contained asbestos." The Sutherlands' case (LASC case # BC486980) was filed on June 20, 2012. Over 30 defendants were named in the case. Settlements were reached with a number of defendants prior to trial. Stucco manufacturer, Highland Stucco and Lime Products, Inc., the sole remaining defendant at trial, argued that other companies and even Mr. Sutherland himself were responsible for his exposure to asbestos. But the jury ultimately assessed blame on Highland for its role in subjecting Mr. Sutherland and other members of the public to its dangerous products. "I was surprised to learn at trial just how much asbestos was in stucco," Mike stated, "even though I rarely worked hands-on with the stuff, I was exposed to dust when the bags were dumped into large mixers and when we had to scrape off areas of over-spray that came into the homes through windows and doors." Mike is grateful for the jury's award and for the hard work of his legal team, but would gladly trade it for the return of his health. Prior to his diagnosis in May 2012, Mike enjoyed his job at UCSD and had no plans of retiring. He also continued to indulge his life-long passion for surfing, hitting the waves on the iconic surf breaks of north county San Diego two or more times a week. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/17274/drywaller-awarded-26-6m-in-asbestos-mesothelioma.html?ref=rss